Top Tags

Tag social networks

Entries 3 Total

The Social Software Primer: 13 Books You Must Read

“To design an interaction you must commit to writing a narrative of human behavior mediated through time and space.”

To discuss social media strategy in the context of design choices affecting application design, functions, as well as user-centricity in social media design, the unique attributes of online communication which can only steer individual and aggregate engagement within the social network through cues, incentives and community enforced social norms must be well understood. Further, to discuss strategy and design patterns in social media site architecture/design and their impact on human behavior requires at the very least a general understanding of the writing on topics concerning sociology, social networking theory, anthropology and marketing. Taken one step further — to adequately advise companies seeking to leverage social media effectively as part of their customer communications and marketing strategy requires a rigorous, and not haphazard understanding of these new channels – attributes unique to them, because they are social in nature.

Until now, at least, I have not seen a list compiled of essential reading. Many people herald themselves and promote others as ‘experts’ and ‘gurus’ when it comes to social software, social media, and the design of strategies, platforms and solutions around these topics for enterprises and government entitites. I thought to myself that this expertise must be born of something more significant and tangible than simply writing a blog about the topic, or having a vast number of connections (friends?) on Facebook or Twitter. I needed some metric, some standard by which I could discern charlatans from strategists. This is my measuring stick. When I rant/rage/ruminate about social media douchebags, I should define my terms and set my standards. This list is an effort to do so. You certainly don’t need to read these – but these are how I measure. To toss around social media douchebag with no standard by which to hurl such an accusation would be as intellectually bankrupt as those that would seek to raid the coffers of well-meaning companies without the skill, passion, or empathy required to deliver real results. This is my list. This is my yard stick.

Needless to say, I just included the Amazon.com reviews or descriptions for lack of time, but all these come highly recommended. These are definite (actually – not quite, but this is all I have read) – these are the shit!

If you have recommendations to add to this list – please chime in, because it’s important. This list is a living organism that must be fed.

13 Books You Must Read – Social Software, Social Networks and Social Media Primer

Designing for the Social Web (Voices That Matter)

Joshua Porter

Designing for the Social Web

Designing for the Social Web

Description: Josh is a web designer, researcher, and writer living in Newburyport, MA, USA. He run a web design and consulting company called Bokardo Design. From Amazon: No matter what type of web site or application you’re building, social interaction among the people who use it will be key to its success. They will talk about it, invite their friends, complain, sing its high praises, and dissect it in countless ways. With the right design strategy you can use this social interaction to get people signing up, coming back regularly, and bringing others into the fold. With tons of examples from real-world interfaces and a touch of the underlying social psychology theory, Joshua Porter shows you how to design your next great social web application.

——

Electronic Tribes: The Virtual Worlds of Geeks, Gamers, Shamans, and Scammers

by Tyrone L. Adams (Editor), Stephen A. Smith (Editor)

Electronic Tribes

Electronic Tribes

Review: The major contribution of this book is that the idea of ‘tribe’ is fully and robustly explicated in ways that challenge existing wisdom, particularly the idea that Internet users are best understood as communities. . . . The richness of diverse research resources is evident in every chapter. I particularly commend the editors on the international perspective and the inclusion of such a surprising array of subcultures. (H. L. Goodall Jr., Director, Hugh Downs School of Human Communication, Arizona State University )

——

First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game

by Noah Wardrip-Fruin

First Person

First Person

Review: “You have entered the rotunda of a gleaming, new conference center. Above you hangs a banner: ‘Welcome to First Person.’ In front of you, you see doors leading into separate conference rooms, each of which is marked with a sign in large, Futura Bold letters: ‘Cyberdrama, ‘ ‘Ludology, ‘ ‘Simulation, ‘ ‘Hypertext and Interactives, ‘ and so on. You soon discover that every room in this virtual conference called First Person is filled with informed discussion and lively controversy from major figures in the emerging field of Game Studies. Some are arguing that digital games (as the heirs of the novel and of film) constitute the next great arena for storytelling; others respond that games are not narratives at all and require a different theoretical framework and a new discipline. Still others are describing their own exciting contributions to interactive fiction, poetry, or visual/verbal art. By the time you return from this virtual tour of the world of Game Studies, you realize that all of these rooms (and all these topics) are connected in an intricate and compelling architecture of ideas. You begin to understand the rich possibilities that computer games offer . . . as drama, narrative, and simulation. You come to appreciate the great theoretical task that lies before us in exploring both the formal properties and the cultural significance of computer games.” –Jay David Bolter, Wesley Professor of New Media, Georgia Institute of Technology

——

Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies

by Charlene Li, Josh Bernoff

Groundswell

Groundswell

Description: Corporate executives are struggling with a new trend: people using online social technologies (blogs, social networking sites, YouTube, podcasts) to discuss products and companies, write their own news, and find their own deals. This groundswell is global, it s unstoppable, it affects every industry and it s utterly foreign to the powerful companies running things now.
When consumers you ve never met are rating your company s products in public forums with which you have no experience or influence, your company is vulnerable. In Groundswell, Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff of Forrester, Inc. explain how to turn this threat into an opportunity.

——

Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means

by Albert-Laszlo Barabasi

Linked

Linked

Review: How is the human brain like the AIDS epidemic? Ask physicist Albert-László Barabási and he’ll explain them both in terms of networks of individual nodes connected via complex but understandable relationships. Linked: The New Science of Networks is his bright, accessible guide to the fundamentals underlying neurology, epidemiology, Internet traffic, and many other fields united by complexity. Barabási’s gift for concrete, non-mathematical explanations and penchant for eccentric humor would make the book thoroughly enjoyable even if the content weren’t engaging. But the results of Barabási’s research into the behavior of networks are deeply compelling. Not all networks are created equal, he says, and he shows how even fairly robust systems like the Internet could be crippled by taking out a few super-connected nodes, or hubs. His mathematical descriptions of this behavior are helping doctors, programmers, and security professionals design systems better suited to their needs. Linked presents the next step in complexity theory–from understanding chaos to practical applications.

——

Networked Publics

by Kazys Varnelis

Networked Publics

Networked Publics

Review: “Networked Publics is a lucid, timely, and broadly interdisciplinary look at the most important technological and social change of our time: the sudden wiring and un-wiring of the planet into a broadband network, with communication devices in the pockets of a significant proportion of the world’s population. There is very little that is more important, more discussed, and less widely understood than the meaning of the emerging technosocial networks that are adopting digital media for a wide range of social, cultural, political, and economic ends. Bringing together an interdisciplinary team of anthropologists, economists, educators, designers, political scientists, computer scientists, legal and policy experts—the Networked Publics group—was the only way to try to capture the meaning of a phenomenon that is interdisciplinary by its nature. The team project blog was a beacon of clear thinking while the project was in progress, and the book is a sound foundation for debates about what networked publics mean, how they can be encouraged, how they should be regulated, how to protect against their dangerous aspects.”
Howard Rheingold, author of Smartbombs: The Next Social Revolution

——

The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life

by Erving Goffman

The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life

The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life

Description: A study of human behavior in social situations and the way we appear to others. Dr. Goffman has employed as a framework the metaphor of theatrical performance. Discussions of social techniques are based upon detailed research and observation of social customs in many regions.

——

Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age (Open Market Edition)

by Duncan J. Watts

Six Degrees

Six Degrees

Review: You may be only six degrees away from Kevin Bacon, but would he let you borrow his car? It depends on the structures within the network that links you. When the power goes out, when we find that a stranger knows someone we know, when dot-com stocks soar in price, networks are evident. In Six Degrees, sociologist Duncan Watts examines networks like these: what they are, how they’re being studied, and what we can use them for. To illustrate the often complicated mathematics that describe such structures, Watts uses plenty of examples from life, without which this book would quickly move beyond a general science readership. Small chapters make each thought-provoking conclusion easy to swallow, though some are hard to digest.

——

Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness (Princeton Studies in Complexity)

by Duncan J. Watts

Small Worlds

Small Worlds

Review: An engaging and informative introduction. Science Playfully and clearly written… [Watts] uses examples adroitly, and mixes abstract theory with real-world anecdotes with superb skill… I have not enjoyed reading a book this much in a long time. — Peter Kareiva Quarterly Review of Biology [Small Worlds] will be seized on by those seeking a first rough map of this fascinating new mathematical land. Those entering can expect to find some amazing connections between areas of research with apparently nothing in common, such as neurology to business studies. But then, it’s a small world. — Robert Matthews New Scientist Informally written and aimed at a wide audience, this book shows how mathematics yields new vistas on ubiquitous and seemingly familiar aspects of our world

——

The Social Atom: Why the Rich Get Richer, Cheaters Get Caught, and Your Neighbor Usually Looks Like You

by Mark Buchanan

The Social Atom

The Social Atom

Description: Buchanan (Ubiquity: The Science of History) reaches out to the audience for pop social science like The Tipping Point and Freakonomics with the concept of “social physics,” a scientific model for the patterns that emerge from the interactions among large groups of people. Though his observations that people excel at imitating the successful behavior of others and will often form collective bonds over such fundamental pretenses as shared ethnic heritage aren’t startling, Buchanan leans on his background in theoretical physics and treats these ideas as “a quantum revolution in the social sciences.” His presentation is muted by a tendency to talk around the subject, recapping prior discussions and promising future developments instead of establishing a clear, compelling thread. Though the real-life scenarios he uses to illustrate his theories—such as the unexpected revival of Times Square or the outbreak of ethnic violence in the former Yugoslavia—are engaging, some sections draw upon computer simulations of arbitrary behavior that illustrate his thesis but don’t command equal interest. This is a great idea for a magazine article, but awkward at book length. (June)

——

Tribes: We Need You to Lead Us

by Seth Godin

Tribes

Tribes

Description: A tribe is any group of people, large or small, who are connected to one another, a leader, and an idea. For millions of years, humans have joined tribes, be they religious, ethnic, political, or even musical (think of the Deadheads). It’s our nature. Now the Internet has eliminated the barriers of geography, cost, and time. All those blogs and social networking sites are helping existing tribes get bigger and enabling new tribes to be born – groups of ten or ten million who care about a political campaign, or a new way to fight global warming.

——

The Wisdom of Crowds

by James Surowiecki

The Wisdom of Crowds

The Wisdom of Crowds

Description: While our culture generally trusts experts and distrusts the wisdom of the masses, New Yorker business columnist Surowiecki argues that “under the right circumstances, groups are remarkably intelligent, and are often smarter than the smartest people in them.” To support this almost counter-intuitive proposition, Surowiecki explores problems involving cognition (we’re all trying to identify a correct answer), coordination (we need to synchronize our individual activities with others) and cooperation (we have to act together despite our self-interest). His rubric, then, covers a range of problems, including driving in traffic, competing on TV game shows, maximizing stock market performance, voting for political candidates, navigating busy sidewalks, tracking SARS and designing Internet search engines like Google. If four basic conditions are met, a crowd’s “collective intelligence” will produce better outcomes than a small group of experts, Surowiecki says, even if members of the crowd don’t know all the facts or choose, individually, to act irrationally. “Wise crowds” need (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (4) a good method for aggregating opinions. The diversity brings in different information; independence keeps people from being swayed by a single opinion leader; people’s errors balance each other out; and including all opinions guarantees that the results are “smarter” than if a single expert had been in charge. Surowiecki’s style is pleasantly informal, a tactical disguise for what might otherwise be rather dense material. He offers a great introduction to applied behavioral economics and game theory.

The Cluetrain Manifesto

by Christopher Locke, Rick Levine, Doc Searls, David Weinberger

Cluetrain Manifesto

Cluetrain Manifesto

Description: The Cluetrain Manifesto began as a Web site (www.cluetrain.com) in 1999 when the authors, who have worked variously at IBM, Sun Microsystems, the Linux Journal, and NPR, posted 95 theses that pronounced what they felt was the new reality of the networked marketplace. For example, thesis no. 2: “Markets consist of human beings, not demographic sectors”; thesis no. 20: “Companies need to realize their markets are often laughing. At them”; thesis no. 62: “Markets do not want to talk to flacks and hucksters. They want to participate in the conversations going on behind the corporate firewall”; thesis no. 74: “We are immune to advertising. Just forget it.” The book enlarges on these themes through seven essays filled with dozens of stories and observations about how business gets done in America and how the Internet will change it all. While Cluetrain will strike many as loud and over the top, the message itself remains quite relevant and unique. This book is for anyone interested in the Internet and e-commerce, and is especially important for those businesses struggling to navigate the topography of the wired marketplace. All aboard! –Harry C. Edwards –This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

——–

This Is [Not] Writing. A Testament to Social Media

This is not writing, to paraphrase Magritte.

Lines insert false time. Full-stop.

Am I to take this seriously?  Is there a truth time of writing and a false time?

Linguists and certain philosophers of language would lead me to believe that there is a basic level of accepted communication, an agreed upon, non-distorted, good enough environment of intimacy, intention, and reception through which we scratch symbols to each other in basic, consensual hallucinatory ways.  One might take blogs as a kind of evidence for this.  If this is true then there is an agreed upon true time of language which is serial, developmental, syllogistic, perhaps progressive, some might even argue aggressive.  I say something, you say something back and shit! we are human and talking the talk of that.

Yet!

Yet, I am also aware, as a poet, architect, madman, that the ideal time of language is at least part constructed if not completely so.  Language poetry would not exist without the Rorty-like assumption that all language is contingent and so any concept of an ideal speech community unfolding their ideas and hopes and prejudices in the “real” or “proper” time of speech-like language is a historical and ideological construct– even/especially on Twitter.  The most political thing I can do is face the language and certainly the work is full of “errors”, errors of conception, expression and understanding, but also conscious errors based on the procedural rules governing the violence-composition of article/comment/connect.  So which time is more false, the semiotically foregrounded temporality of poetic lineation, or the hidden, naturalised time of prose, even non-narrative prose such as we would have here if not for my sickness?

What I might be saying here pretty much agrees with a definition of a typical feature of poetry before proving through a historical event, a necessary foundation for poetry is merely a significant historical contingency whose time is already passed.  However, while I look for ways to innovate poetry in prose, I have to be beware the seduction of the prose whose transparent linearity is more dangerous in that it is widespread, that narrative prose is the rhetorical preference of the state and its institutions of coercion (what is not new except a really good story chopped up into tasty morsels?) and that is it so hidden.  Television’s lie is the continuity. If you ask someone to tell you how it happened, say in a court room to use a Lyotardian environment, and they tell it to you in the temporality of the poem, would that be acceptable testimony?  Objection!  Next witness.

What I sacrifice, that the time of the line is material, embodied, visual, disruptive, sexually potent, radical, and sharpened at both ends.  Contrast the semiotics of poetic lineation to those of prose with its full-stops and alinea (paragraph breaks).  The full-stop is rarely used as a disruptive strategy and certainly not in mine.  Why innovate in the space between sentences– but rarely, if ever, disrupt the sentence itself?

The sentence is to language as a porn flick is to love. In other words, sentences are socialised language while poetry is somehow, in being more glossolalic, literally semiotic and so goes beyond ideology. The simplicity of the sentences is the ice pick to the brain I feel as I try to get at the ideological-linguistic fabric of post-industrian, pre-simulation social interaction.  Either that or I just walked into the snow with nothing but boxers on– poetically speaking, of course.

This is not an idea, to paraphrase Magritte.

Testaments…

the wind in rustling in your hair tells a story of what has dropped off a thousand miles away is the intention to gather up and then rush at it an energy distributed then through shallowness to optics

Sepia tones of light and dust fill the room
I’d been lying in bed for a month
one afternoon

I think somewhere there is a room
in which I am living
an old man

in the future
in a windy
room where I am sitting and
glyphs scroll across my
eyes

————–

the body is what falls from me as I rise in that [bracketed way] by this this (parenthetical) to the other all it is a process of wanting to get closer to that big mooning face

trying to make out
what I had once written
in what will then be
passing for the present,
blindly

trying to remember
the room
the light the time of day
when the evil whispered
the wind

————–

even in my muteness, I too am homeless; only semi-detached I’ve been saving up for true immediacy ‘halt who lurks there,’ goes nowhere, this unfurling which is ending up interminable as a blanketing of bold insecurity and intimacy

Yellow light filled the room
Don’t let them inside
your eyes, my evil
said
and lay their eggs there

————–

Pale amber light and dust filled the room,

I have become so certain of uncertainty meanwhile el niño has given rise to cases of hurtling upwards my own super-subjectivity of a being of total dissemination whose myriad parts and I fully occupy all and at the same time…

sepia tones of light I assumed
coming through the cracked windows
but no

more a feeling, though light, too

a healing

And I saw again, September’s sunflower

————–

petal’s intense gold flames

you feel the gentle warmth on your back articulated like the spine of a vast earth goddess let loose amidst the peaks to rise as ether carrying her displacement on her back. then a passage through.

a child’s drawing
of the sun

And loved again
the absolute unsayableness
of the simplest thing in pain
the way it was, exactly

Walking out again

Into the pale yellow light.

Esse Is Percipi: Self & Social Networks

Soundtrack: Koyaanisquatsi, “Prophesies”

This is another article exploring Identity, Self & Social Networks within the context of various western philosophers. A previous article entitled “Heidegger 2 Twitter, Technology, Self and Social Networks,” was written previously and exists antecedent to this article. The goal of these blog postings is to find placement of our current circumstances within the traditions of modern philosophical thought, as it were.

“Nothing is more bourgeois than to be afraid to look bourgeois.”

Tom Wolfe (The Painted Word. Stated in regard to Andy Warhol.)

Esse Is Percipi

George Berkeley is probably the philosopher in the Western tradition who most fully anticipates our current ideas about our experience of reality on social networks. He notoriously argues that esse is percipi: to be is to be perceived. In his own time, Berkeley was merely taking the doctrine of empiricism to its logical extreme. If our minds contain nothing but atomistic perceptions – which is to say, ideas or representations-then it is superfluous to posit, in addition, a material world out there that would be independent of these ideas, although supposedly giving rise to them. Mental representations themselves are enough, says Berkeley, especially since — according to our initial assumptions — we can never get beyond them in any case. Berkeley’s argument reads like an unintended reductio ad absurdum of what Richard Rorty calls “the ‘idea’ idea”: the Cartesian notion that the mind is like a theater in which consciousness is a detached spectator that contemplates and manipulates special objects of inner sense (ideas or representations). The major philosophical question then becomes that of how our mental representations relate to their corresponding objects in the material world.

The genius of Berkeley is to simply short-circuit this whole dilemma, by negating the material world altogether. His radical conclusions follow logically and powerfully from his dubious initial premises. Now, nearly all of the important twentieth-century philosophers reject “the ‘idea’ idea” in the first place. But the representationalist approach remains alive and well in other fields, most notably in AI (artificial intelligence) research and in cognitive science. Cognitive scientists start from the assumption — not that computers should be understood by comparison to human minds, but rather that human minds themselves can already be understood in terms of computers. This is more than just “some rough analogy,” says Andy Clark; “it is not that the brain is somehow like a computer,” but that it “actually is some such device”. This means that cognitive scientists conceive minds, on the model of digital computers, as information processors that work by performing logical operations upon internal representations of external phenomena. This is why Berkeley is still relevant today. In twenty-first century terms, his argument may be rephrased as the claim that our experience of existence is already virtual. And that is indeed what the cognitive scientists say. They claim that the “real world” of our perceptions is in fact largely a construction of our own inner cognitive processes. “You and I, we humans, we mammals, we animals, inhabit a virtual world…the brain works as a sophisticated virtual reality computer” wrote Dawkins in “Unweaving the Rainbow.” Our sense of reality is the product of simulation. It only remains for the cognitive scientists to follow Berkeley all the way down that road and jettison the “outer world” altogether as an extravagant, unnecessary hypothesis. I have become my Twitter personality @semanticwill and there is no need for Will Evans in meat-space.There will then be no escaping the control of the social network.

Eyes Wide Fucking Shut.

Berkeley is surprisingly unperturbed by the obvious objection that, if his theory were correct, then objects would cease to exist whenever we stopped looking at them. He dismisses this worry on a number of grounds, all of which apply just as well to our current conceptions of reality in social networks. First of all, Berkeley says, if things exist only as perceptions or representations in the mind, then that tree yonder just as surely exists when i am thinking of it with my eyes closed as it does when I am looking at it directly. In either case, the tree is being perceived as an idea by my inner sense. Berkeley brackets the whole question of the cause of perception; what matters is only its effect within my mind. But this is the very principle of virtual reality; as Deleuze puts it, “simulation designates the power of producing an effect” even in the absence of anything that is supposed to be  a cause. In the second place, Berkeley says, the fact that I may only perceive a given object intermittently doesn’t impugn the consistency of the object. There is no reason why the object shouldn’t have the same features and appear in the same place whenever I do happen to perceive it or think of it. There is no more reason for me to worry that the tree will be uprooted because I took away from it than there is for me to worry that the objects of a virtual world, or the icons on my desktop, will dissipate because I turn off my computer. In either case– when I look back at the tree, or when I turn the computer on again–I will find that everything is exactly the way I left it. In the third place, and most importantly for Berkeley, just because a given idea is no longer present in my mind does not mean that it is likewise absent from all other minds just as when I turn off Tweetdeck, most of my virtual connections still exist — and many continue to converse even in my absence.

The proper logical conclusion from the intermittency of my ideas is “not that [sensible objects] have no real existence,” but rather that “there must be some other mind wherein they exist”. Ultimately, for Berkeley, this other mind is God. Today, we are more likely to say that it is the computer, or better, the network, on which the virtual reality simulation is being run , or even, in the case of the ‘other’ instantiated through their Profile on a social network – I am because my profile exists on the social network. Perhaps this is the reason for the proliferation of home pages, blogs, and profiles on social networking sites. To be online is already to be perceived. Even if no one ever visits your website, you are still visible to the network itself. Your Profile is still on Facebook, or LinkedIn, or MySpace. [You] still exist. For the network is the modern instantiation and understanding of G-d, the unsleeping omni-voyeur. The cogito of simulated reality therefore reads: I am connected, therefore I exist.

Long before the internet, Warhol already understood this logic. His film Empire (1964) shows the Empire State Building in a single continuous stationary shot that lasts for over eight hours. Warhol’s stated purpose in making this film was to turn the building into “a star!”. And we must say that he succeeded, just by virtue of having made the film. Nobody actually has to watch Empire in order for the movie to have its effect. As long as the film is rolling through the projector, the virtual, simulacra image is perceived, as it were, by the cinematic apparatus itself; and so the Empire State Building actually is a star.

Appearances, Profiles & Self

Perhaps the oddest thing about Berkeley’s argument is his claim that, in fact, the argument has no pragmatic consequences. “After having wandered through the wild mazes of philosophy,” he writes, we “return to the simple dictates of nature,” and “come to think like other men”. Berkeley indulges in metaphysical speculation, the better to put an end to such speculation. He denies the existence of matter, he says, only in order to refute skepticism and vindicate the assumptions of common sense. This may seem like a crazy, and outrageously backward, way to proceed, but Berkeley’s point is that the best way of “saving the appearances” is to show that there is nothing besides appearances, no real world behind this apparent one. In an immaterial world — or what is the same, a virtual world–nothing is hidden, and everything is precisely what it seems.

In a certain way, then, Berkeley anticipates Nietzsche‘s polemic against those metaphysicians who distrust the senses. Berkeley could easily say, along with Nietzsche, that the senses “do not lie at all…The ‘apparent’ world is the only one; the ‘real’ world has only been lyingly added…”. Berkeley’s critique of skepticism is oddly congruent with Nietzsche’s critique of nihilism. For Berkeley, skepticism arises when we posit the existence of an external, material world, only to discover that we can know nothing about such a world and that we can have no access to it. For Nietzsche, similarly, nihilism arises when we posit the existence of a transcendent “real world,” only to discover that such a world is empty and that we can have no access to it. Of course, it is crucial that Berkeley denies the existence of the transcendent materiality, while Nietzsche denies the existence of transcendent ideality. The radical conclusion Nietzsche draws form his arguments could not be further from the pious conclusions Berkeley draws from his. For Nietzsche, everything changes when we learn to accept appearances – that My Profile == Me; traditional conceptions of self crumble, and everything must be created anew. For Berkeley, in contrast, nothing changes; the order of the world is confirmed, once we realize that everything is just an appearance – My Profile != Me – it is just a projection of self. We can read Nietzsche and Berkeley, therefore, as rival science fiction writers, offering alternative visions of what Michael Heim calls “the metaphysics of simulated instantiations of self,” on social networks.